Relationship between intelligence quotient with simple and diagnostic reaction times in female college students

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the relation between intelligence quotient with simple and diagnostic reaction times in females college students. Sixty student (27.72 ± 1.88) having no background of regular exercises were selected non-randomly.
To determine the subjects' intelligence, form B of the Cattle Scale 3 intelligence test, which is culture independent, was used. The test was carried out collectively with time limit. Afterwards, the subjects' intelligence quotient was determined by the normative tables. Measurment of the reaction times were manipulated in two stages. Stage one was simple and the  second stage was diagnostic. Our data were statistically analyzed by Pearson correlation and t-student As to the results, there was significant relationship (r =-0.32, P<0.05) between intelligence quotient with diagnostic reaction time.

Keywords

References

. اشمیت، ریچارد ای. (1375 ). مفاهیم اساسی و شیوه‌های مطالعه رفتار و یادگیری حرکتی. ترجمة سیّدمحمّدکاظم واعظ موسوی. تهران. انتشارات دانشگاه امام حسین(ع).
2. اشمیت، ریچارد ای.(1376 ). یادگیری حرکتی و اجرا از اصول تا تمرین. ترجمة مهدی نمازی‌زاده و سیّدمحمّدکاظم واعظ موسوی. تهران. انتشارات سمت.
3. آناستازی، آن.(1371 ) تفاوت‌های فردی. ترجمة جواد طهوریان. مشهد. انتشارات آستان قدس رضوی. چاپ سوم .
4. براهنی، محمّدنقی. (1373). هوش عمومی یا سرعت پردازش اطّلاعات. مجلّة اندیشه و رفتار. شمارة 9. ص 17 ـ 9 .
5. رحیمیان مشهدی، مریم.(1376). بررسی ارتباط بهرة هوشی با زمان عکس العمل دانشجویان دختر ورزشکار و غیر ورزشکار . دانشگاه تهران . پایان‌نامة کارشناسی ارشد. دانشگاه تهران.
6. شریفی، حسن.(1376). نظریّه و کاربرد آزمون‌های شخصیّت. تهران. انتشارات سخن.
7. کوپر، کالین.(1379). تفاوت‌های فردی. ترجمة حسن پاشا شریفی، جعفر نجفی زند. تهران. انتشارات سخن.
8. Buckhalt, J.A., Whang,P.A., Fischman, M. G. (1998).Reaction time and movement time relationships with intelligence in three different simple tasks. Person. individ Diff.24.(4)PP,493-497.
9. Chan,J.W.C., Eysenck, H. J.,  Lynn, R.(1991). Reaction times and intelligence among Hong Kong children.Perceptual and Motor Skills.72.PP.427-433.
10.Choudhury, N., Gorman, K. S. (1999).The relationship between reaction time and psychometric intelligence in a rural Guatemalan adolescent population.International Jounal of Psychology.(4).PP,209-217.
11. Frearson, W., Eysenck, H. J. (1986).Intelligence, reaction time and the "odd man out" R. T. paradigm. Person. Indiv. Diff, 7. PP,807-818.
12. Jensen, A. R., Munro, E.(1979). Reaction time, Movement, and intelligence. Intelligence. 3. PP, 121-126.
13. Lynn, R., Chan, J. W. C., Eysenck, H.J.(1991). Reaction times and intelligence in Chinese and British children. Perceptual and Motor Sills. 72.PP,443-452.
14. Neubauer, A.C., Riemann, R., Mayer, R., Angleitner, A. (1997). Intelligence and reaction times in the Hick, Sternberg and Posner paradigms. Person, indiv. Diff. 22. (6).pp,885-894.
15. Rijsdijk, F. V., Vernon, P.A., Boomsma, D. I.(1998). The genetic basis of the relation between speed of information processing anf IQ. Behavioral Brain Research.95.PP,77-84.
16. Stanko, L., and Roberts, R.D.(1997). Mental Speed is not the basis process of intelligence. Person Individ  Diff. 22.PP, 69-84.
17. Taimela, S.(1991). Factors affecting reaction time testing and the interperation of results. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 73.PP, 1195-1202.
18. Ulrich, R., Rinkenauer, G., Miller,J. (1998). Effects of Stimulus duration and intensity of simple reaction time and response force. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance. 24(3). PP, 915-928.
19. Whitey, J.D., Montano, L.(1992). Relation between reaction time in college wrestlers. Perceptual and motor skills.74.PP,171-176.
Journal of Applied Exercise Physiology
Volume 2, Issue 4 - Serial Number 4
December 2006
Pages 27-34

Files

History

  • Receive Date: 10 June 2006
  • Revise Date: 31 October 2016
  • Accept Date: 13 January 2007

Share

How to cite

Statistics