اثر کینزیوتیپ بر ثبات دینامیک مفصل مچ پا

نوع مقاله: مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده

استادیار حرکات اصلاحی و آسیب شناسی ورزشی، دانشکده علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه مازندران، بابلسر، ایران

چکیده

مقدمه: با توجه به اهمیت ثبات دینامیک مچ پا در اجرای موفق فعالیتهای ورزشی، این مطالعه به بررسی ثبات دینامیک مفصل مچ پا پس از استفاده از کینزیوتیپ میپردازد و نقش آنرا در دو گروه پای طبیعی و پرونیت بررسی می­کند.
موارد و روش‌ها: در این مطالعه 31 ورزشکار سالم (15 نفر پای طبیعی و 16 نفر پای پرونیت) 20 تا 30 ساله شرکت کردند. تعادل دینامیک آزمودنی­ها از طریق تست تعادل ستاره، قبل و بعد از استفاده از کینزیوتیپ در مچ پا مورد ارزیابی قرار گرفت. از آزمون "تی مستقل" برای مقایسه دو نوع پا در دو زمان قبل و بعد از کینزیوتیپ و از آزمون "تی زوجی" برای مقایسه قبل و بعد از کینزیوتیپ در کل آزمودنی­ها و هریک از گروه­ها استفاده شد (05/0≥ α).
یافته ها: قبل از استفاده از کینزیوتیپ و بعد از آن، تفاوت معنیداری بین دو گروه پای طبیعی و پرونیت در همه جهات حرکتی وجود نداشت (05/0≤P) و فقط در جهت خلفی قبل از کینزیوتیپ اختلاف معنی­دار بود (04/0=P). همچنین در مقایسه قبل و بعد از استفاده از کینزیوتیپ در کل آزمودنی­ها، تفاوت معنیدار در جهات قدامی، خلفی، قدامی- داخلی، خلفی- داخلی، و خلفی- خارجی مشاهده شد که در بررسی جداگانه هریک از گروه­ها، این تفاوت­ها در گروه پرونیت بیشتر بود (05/0≥P).
نتیجه گیری: استفاده از کینزیوتیپ می­تواند ثبات دینامیک مچ پا را افزایش دهد و این تفاوت در پای پرونیت بیشتر است.

کلیدواژه‌ها


عنوان مقاله [English]

The effect of kinesiotaping on ankle joint dynamic stability

نویسنده [English]

  • Rose Fouladi
Sport biomechanic and physiology department, Faculty of sports sciences, University of Mazandaran, Babolsar, Iran
چکیده [English]

Abstract:
Introduction: Since the importance of ankle dynamic stability on sport performances, this article is going to assess ankle dynamic stability after kinesiotaping and its effect on neutral and pronated foot.
Method: In this study, 31 healthy athletes (15 neutral and 16 pronated foot) at 20-30 years old participated. Their dynamic balance tested by Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT), before and after ankle kinesiotaping. For data analysis, “student T-test” was used for comparing pronated with neutral foot at before and after taping separately and “paired T-test” to compare each type of foot before and after kinesiotaping. (α≤0/05)
Results: There were no significant differences between pronated and neutral foot in all directions, before and after kinesiotaping (P≥0.05), except at posterior direction before taping (P=0/04). Also significant differences were seen at anterior, posterior, anteromedial, posteromedial and posterolateral, in comparing before and after kinesiotaping of all subjects, that more was belong to pronated foot (P≤0.05)
Conclusion: Kinesiotaping can improve ankle dynamic stability, especially in pronated foot.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • kinesiotape
  • ankle dynamic stability
  • SEBT
  • pronated foot
##Cote, K.P., et al., Effects of pronated and supinated foot postures on static and dynamic postural stability. Journal of athletic training, 2005. 40(1): p. 41.##Shumway-Cook, A. and M.H. Woollacott, Motor control: translating research into clinical practice. 2007: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.##Perry, J., Gait analysis. Normal and pathological function, 2010: p. 19-47.##Delahunt, E., Neuromuscular contributions to functional instability of the ankle joint. Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies, 2007. 11(3): p. 203-213.##Palmieri, R.M., et al., Center-of-pressure parameters used in the assessment of postural control. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 2002. 11(1): p. 51-66.##Earl, J.E. and J. Hertel, Lower-extremity muscle activation during the Star Excursion Balance Tests. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 2001. 10(2): p. 93-104.##Zech, A., et al., Balance training for neuromuscular control and performance enhancement: a systematic review. Journal of athletic training, 2010. 45(4): p.392-403.##Young, W.K. and J.D. Metzl, Strength training for the young athlete. Pediatric annals, 2010. 39(5): p. 293-299.##Mohammadi, V., M. Alizadeh, and A. Gaieni, The effects of six weeks strength exercises on static and dynamic balance of young male athletes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2012. 31: p. 247-250.##Wyke, B., The neurology of joints. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 1967. 41(1): p. 25.##Freeman, M., M. Dean, and I. Hanham, The etiology and prevention of functional instability of the foot. The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume, 1965. 47(4): p. 678-685.##Rowinski, M., Orthopaedic and sports physical therapy. St Louis (MO): CV Mosby, 1990.##Spanos, S., M. Brunswic, and E. Billis, The effect of taping on the proprioception of the ankle in a non-weight bearing position, amongst injured athletes. The foot, 2008. 18(1): p. 25-33.##Macdonald, R., Taping techniques: principles and practice. 2004: Butterworth-Heinemann Medical.##Seo, H.-D., et al., Effects of Kinesio taping on joint position sense of the ankle. Journal of physical therapy science, 2016. 28(4): p. 1158-1160.##Delahunt, E., et al., Effect of taping on actual and perceived dynamic postural stability in persons with chronic ankle instability. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2010. 91(9): p. 1383-1389.##Kim, B.-J., et al., Effects of ankle balance taping with kinesiology tape for a patient with chronic ankle instability. Journal of physical therapy science, 2015. 27(7): p. 2405-2406.##Hooker, A., The effect of kinesiology tape on ankle stability and muscle activation of the peroneals during a double leg to single leg stance and a Y-Balance stability test. 2017, University of Chichester.##Fadaei dehcheshmeh, T., Shamsi majelan A., Effect of kinesio tape on function of lower extremity and pain severity in athletes with and without medial tibial stress. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences (JMUMS), 2016. 26(137): p.104-115.(in persian).##Neely, F.G., Biomechanical risk factors for exercise-related lower limb injuries. Sports medicine, 1998. 26(6): p. 395-413.##Karatsolis, K., et al., Eversion and inversion muscle group peak torque in hyperpronated and normal individuals. The Foot, 2009. 19(1): p. 29-35.##Wilkerson, G.B., J.J. Pinerola, and R.W. Caturano, Invertor vs. evertor peak torque and power deficiencies associated with lateral ankle ligament injury. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 1997. 26(2): p. 78-86.##Rasool, J. and K. George, The impact of single-leg dynamic balance training on dynamic stability. Physical therapy in sport, 2007. 8(4): p. 177-184.##Herrington, L., et al., A comparison of Star Excursion Balance Test reach distances between ACL deficient patients and asymptomatic controls. The Knee, 2009. 16(2): p. 149-152.##Gribble, P.A., J. Hertel, and P. Plisky, Using the Star Excursion Balance Test to assess dynamic postural-control deficits and outcomes in lower extremity injury: a literature and systematic review. Journal of athletic training, 2012. 47(3): p. 339-357.##Kase, K., Development of Kinesio^< TM> tape. Kinesio^< TM> Taping Perfect Manual, 1996.##Hyong, I.H. and J.H. Kang, Comparison of dynamic balance ability in healthy university students according to foot shape. Journal of physical therapy science, 2016. 28(2): p. 661-664.##Kim, J.-a., O.-b. Lim, and C.-h. Yi, Difference in static and dynamic stability between flexible flatfeet and neutral feet. Gait & posture, 2015. 41(2): p. 546-550.##Koura, G.M., et al., Impact of foot pronation on postural stability: An observational study. Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation, 2017(Preprint): p. 1-6.##Someeh, M., et al., Influence of Mulligan ankle taping on functional performance tests in healthy athletes and athletes with chronic ankle instability. International Journal of Athletic Therapy and Training, 2015. 20(1): p. 39-45.##Moon, D.-c., K. Kim, and S.-k. Lee, Immediate effect of short-foot exercise on dynamic balance of subjects with excessively pronated feet. Journal of physical therapy science, 2014. 26(1): p. 117-119.##